Hyperbaric oxygenation was associated with improved survival and possibly local recurrence rate following irradiation of tumours of the head and neck.

 

Clinical Bottom Line:

1. There was a significant increase in five year survival when this dosage regime of radiotherapy was given while having hyperbaric oxygenation.

2. There was some evidence of an improvement in local recurrence rate with hyperbaric oxygen.

Appraised by:  Mike Bennett, Dept of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney; Sunday, 28 February 1999

 

Clinical Scenario:  A patient presented with oral cancer for radiotherapy. We wondered if performing the radiotherapy while breathing hyperbaric oxygen would improve outcome.

Three-part Question: In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, does the administration of hyperbaric oxygen during radiotherapy, compared to breathing air, result in an improved survival or local control rate?

Search Terms: Hyperbaric oxygenation, tumours/head and neck

 

The Study:

Non-blinded concealed randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.

Patients with SCC of the mouth, upper airway or middle ear where the therapeutic treatment of choice was radiotherapy.

Control group (N = 52; 52 analysed): 30 equal fractions of radiotherapy over 6 weeks to a total dose of 6,500rads (1875rets).

Experimental group (N = 51; 51 analysed): 10 equal fractions over 22 days to a dose of 4,100 rads (1875 rets). Different dosing regime but equivalent nominal standard dose except when the larynx was irradiated (10% reduction). Oxygen dose not given.

 

The Evidence:

Outcome

Time to Outcome

Air group

HBO rate

Relative risk reduction

Absolute risk reduction

NNT

Survival

4 years

.27

.56

107%

0.290

3

95% CI:

 

 

 

40% to 100%

0.108 to 0.472

2 to 9

Recurrence free

4 years

.40

.61

53%

0.210

5

95% CI:

 

 

 

5% to 100%

0.021 to 0.399

3 to 47

 

 Comments:

1.Full figures for survival/recurrence not given, making the table above unreliable.

2.This trial follows the earlier study by same workers. Dose regime changed for this trial to compare usual therapy against a small fraction therapy for the air group.

3.Relevance to today's practice of these findings may be slight.

4.Authors comment that the therapy is difficult and time consuming.

 

Expiry date: January 2004

References:1.Henk JM, Smith CW. Radiotherapy and hyperbaric oxygen in head and neck cancer. Interim report of second clinical trial. Lancet 1977; 8014:104-105.

2. Henk JM. Late results of a trial of hyperbaric oxygen and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a rationale for hypoxic cell sensitizers? International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 1986; 12:1339-1341.

3. Henk JM. Overcoming the oxygen effect: hyperbaric oxygen or protracted fractionation. Fifth International Hyperbaric Congress Proceedings II 1974:794-801.

4. Henk JM. The influence of oxygen and hypoxia on laryngeal cancer management. Laryngoscope 1975;85:1134-1144.

Home Up Search Database Links Introduction Index What is a CAT?