Hyperbaric
oxygenation significantly shortens the elimination half-life of
carboxyhaemoglobin.
Clinical Bottom Line:
1.
Elimination half-life of carboxyhaemoglobin was significantly decreased by the
administration of hyperbaric oxygenation at 1.58ATA.
Appraised
by: Mike Bennett, Dept. of Diving and
Hyperbaric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital
Sydney; Thursday, 10 December,
1998
Clinical
Scenario: A patient with carbon monoxide
poisoning.
Three-part
Question: For patients with elevated
levels of carboxyhaemoglobin, does administration of hyperbaric oxygen, compared
to a normobaric regime, result in more rapid reduction in carboxyhaemoglobin?
Search
Terms: hyperbaric oxygenation, carbon
monoxide.
The
Study:
Non-blinded randomised
controlled crossover trial with intention-to-treat.
Healthy volunteer smokers
exposed to a standard regime of five cigarettes in an hour to produce elevated
COHb levels.
Control group (N =12 ;12
analysed): 40 minutes of oxygen via non-rebreathing mask at 15 liters/min.
Experimental group (N =12 ;12
analysed): 40 minutes of 100% oxygen at 1.58 ATA in a Gamow bag
inflatable chamber.
The
Evidence:
Non-Event
NBO group
HBO group
P-value
Outcomes
Half-life
of COHb
71.3 minutes
28.6 minutes
P<0.05
Comments:
1. No clinical outcomes, so the
significance of these findings is not clear.
2. Further statistical
evaluation suggests a shift from zero order to first order kinetics on
application of hyperbaric oxygen.
3. This study addresses
experimental, mild CO poisoning, unlike the clinical situation.
4. Two reports appear to be
using the same data although slightly different t1/2s are published. Conclusions
are identical.
Expiry date: September 2004
References:
1.
Jay GD, McKindley DS. Alterations in pharmacokinetics of
carboxyhaemoglobin produced by oxygen under pressure. Undersea and Hyperbaric
Medicine 1997; 24:165-174.
2.
Jay GD, Tetz DJ, Hartigan CF, Lane LL, Aghababian RV. Portable
hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the emergency department with the modified Gamow
bag. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1995; 26:707-711.
![]()