|
1. Pre-operative HBOT was
associated with a reduced chance of neuropsychiatric deficit when defined
as a reduction of >1 standard deviation in two of seven tests |
Citation:
1. Alex J, Laden G, Cale A, Bennett S, Flowers K, Madden L, Gardiner E, McCollum
T, Griffin S. Pretreatment with hyperbaric oxygen and its effect on
neuropsychometric dysfunction and systemic inflammatory response after
cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective randomised double-blind trial. Journal of
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005;130(6):1623-30.
2.
Alex J. Yogartnam JZ, Laden G, Cale ARJ, Bennett S, Guvendik L, McCollum PT,
Griffin SC. Hyperoxic hyperbaric pre-conditioning induces neuroprotection and
attenuates the systemic inflammatory response in a human model of ischemic
reperfusion injury. European Journal of Hyperbaric Medicine 2005; 6(3):76-77.
Lead author's name and fax: Joseph Alex mrjosephalex@yahoo.co.uk
Three-part Clinical Question: For patients having cardiac operations using
cardiopulmonary bypass, does pre-treatment with hyperbaric oxygen versus a
standard approach result in a reduction in neuropsychiatric deficit and/or
systemic inflammatory response?
Search Terms: Cardiac surgical procedures, neuropsychology, inflammation
mediators
The Study:
Double-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: Adults without cerebrovascular disease or
immunosuppresion having routine cardiac procedures using CPB
Control group (N = 31; 31 analysed): Sham procedure at 24, 12 and 4 hours
before operation breathing air at 1.5 ATA for 60 minutes
Experimental group (N = 33; 33 analysed): 100% oxygen at 2.4 ATA on the
same schedule
The Evidence:
|
Outcome |
Time
to Outcome |
Sham
group |
HBO
group |
Relative
risk reduction |
Absolute
risk reduction |
NNT |
|
>1 SD deterioration
in two or more NPTs |
4 months |
0.52 |
0.27 |
47% |
0.24 |
4 |
|
95% Confidence Intervals: |
2% to 92% |
0.01 to 0.48 |
2 to 95 |
|||
|
Non-Event Outcomes |
Time to outcome/s |
Control group |
Experimental group |
ANOVA for CD-18 at pre-op, 2
hrs and 24 hours post-op within each group (units unknown) |
24 hours |
P = 0.1 (63.6 to 83.8 at 2 hours) |
P = 0.001 (63.3 to 77.5 at 2 hours) |
Comments:
1. Numbers reaching follow-up not indicated, no sample size calculations or 95%
CI for main outcome
2. There are practical difficulties with three pre-operative hyperbaric sessions
3. No direct comparison between groups for any inflammatory marker changes
4.
The impact on daily life of the overall decrement in neuropsychological testing
is not clear
4. The zero time for inflammatory mediators is after HBOT, making interpretation
difficult
5. Those with previous myocardial infarction were over-represented in the HBOT
group (31% versus 10%) which may bias outcome, direction unknown.
6. There is information in the abstract that does not appear in the main text
and no units for the inflammatory markers
7. Overall good methodological study with a result that is difficult to
interpret
Appraised by: Sean Hopson, Antonia Edge & Mike Bennett,
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney ; Friday, 26
May 2006
Email:
Kill or Update By: August 2008